Guild Capacity

[Friday05]

If i were to make my most humble opinion, correct me if im wrong, but isnt the guild treasure amount still kept the same? but the amount of players allowed to join in WOE is reduced to 20 guild capacity? i think its too much that 20 people will share the loot of a castle treasure designed for 50++ players joining. What if we just open more castles but allow limited players per guild to join, (could even be lesser than 20), but the amount of treasures looted per castle is of course adjusted as well. That way more people can join, the amount loots get distributed better, you dont have to kick out friends on your same guild they can just make an alliance guild and go to another castle, less lag during fights, of course i think access to guild instance would be adjusted for the really "cheap castles".  I also think that flat out decreasing the main castle's loot will just upset people as well, soo why not distribute it to even smaller castles with lesser guild capacities? i know it sounds dumb but why would we want to distribute participants if our population is low to begin with? im just suggesting this to distribute the deficit of players who cant join, and also distributing the available loot as well, but im just im expressing my opinion and a way to satisfy everyone,